termPage.definition
The discipline by which ḥadīth scholars evaluated each narrator's trustworthiness — preserving the religion from corruption. A unique achievement of the Muslim Ummah unparalleled in any other tradition's textual history.
termPage.pronunciation al-JARḤ wa at-ta‘-DĪL
termPage.etymologyHeading
Jarḥ = 'wounding' (criticism); ta‘dīl = 'declaring upright.' The scholar 'wounds' a weak narrator's reliability or 'validates' a trustworthy one.
termPage.scholarlyNotes
Foundational works include Ibn Abī Ḥātim's al-Jarḥ wa at-Ta‘dīl, al-Bukhārī's Tārīkh al-Kabīr, Ibn Ḥajar's Tahdhīb at-Tahdhīb, and adh-Dhahabī's Mīzān al-I‘tidāl. The Companions are exempt — their uprightness is established by the Qur'an and Sunnah.
termPage.commonMisconceptions
Critique of a narrator is not personal slander — it is religious counsel (naṣīḥah) protecting the Sharī‘ah from unreliable transmission, and the scholars who engaged in it were the most God-conscious.
Search across the corpus
termPage.relatedTerms
termPage.moreFrom
Agreed upon by Bukhārī and Muslim.
Singular reports — not mutawātir.
Authentic — the highest grade of hadith.
Attributed directly to the Prophet ﷺ.
Weak — does not meet the conditions of authenticity.
Good — second grade of authentic hadith.